This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Scott, R. B Articles by Carpenter, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scott, R. B Articles by Carpenter, K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Methodology of neuropsychological research in multicentre randomized clinical trials: a model derived from The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial

Russell Cairns Unit, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UKrbs{at}neuropsyche.net

Elly Farmer

Amanda Smiton

Caroline Tovey

Russell Cairns Unit, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

Mike Clarke

Clinical Trials Support Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

Katherine Carpenter

Russell Cairns Unit, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

As advances in medicine and surgery lead to reductions in mortality rates for life-threatening conditions, it has become increasingly important to refine the methodology of auditing long-term morbidity. The inclusion of appropriate neuropsychological outcomes in a large multicentre randomized clinical trial poses considerable methodological and logistical difficulties. This paper presents a model developed to implement such a multicentre neuropsychological and quality of life audit for a subset of patients within the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), the largest ever randomized trial in the treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Based on our experience of collecting quality of life and neuropsychological outcomes from more than 550 patients, data are presented on the relative cost and efficacy of different organizational strategies, methods of canvassing patients and associated response rates. On the basis of this experience, we estimate a potential recruitment pool of 135 cases would be required to obtain some neuropsychological data on 100 cases. The design of any similar trial would therefore need to accommodate a loss to follow-up of approximately one third of the sample. In addition, our experience suggests that for a trial of this size and complexity, the deployment of centrally-based co-ordinators travelling to satellite centres is more cost-effective than employing co-ordinators based at those centres. Extrapolations from the observations and calculations reported here can be employed as an evidence base to inform the design of neuropsychological outcome studies in large multicentre trials.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 1, No. 1, 31-39 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774504cn008xx


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. K. Lal Cognitive Function After Carotid Artery Revascularization Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]