SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eberly, L. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eberly, L. E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multiple-stage screening and mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

Lynn E Eberly

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 303, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0378, USAlynn{at}biostat.umn.edu

James D Neaton

Avis J Thomas

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Yu Dai

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group

Background During the design phase of a clinical trial, sample size estimates should take into account medical screening criteria, the ‘healthy volunteer’ effect, consequences of run-in phases, and secular trends in the event rate of interest. All of these have been shown to relate to subsequent event rates, and hence trial power to detect intervention effects. The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) used three successive screenings of 361 662 men to enroll 12 866; observed coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality after a mean of 6.9 years was substantially lower than projected during design. We explore factors which may have contributed to these mortality differences and whether they persisted throughout follow-up.

Methods Proportional hazards models were used to compare 25-year mortality according to trial eligibility, self-exclusions, medical exclusions, and participation.

Results After adjustment for baseline risk factors and age, there was higher mortality among men excluded for presence of disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43–1.61, for total; HR 1.92, CI 1.75–2.11, for CHD] compared to those not excluded which persisted throughout follow-up. Volunteers had lower total (HR 0.82, CI 0.76–0.87) and CHD (HR 0.79, CI 0.70–0.88) mortality than those discontinuing participation. Men excluded with characteristics deemed likely to interfere with adherence had higher total (HR 1.19, CI 1.07–1.33) and noncardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR 1.32, CI 1.14–1.53) mortality but no higher CVD (HR 1.04, CI 0.88–1.23) or CHD (HR 0.98, CI 0.80–1.20) mortality compared to those not excluded. Differences in mortality were stronger during the first five years, but declined only slightly over 25 years.

Conclusions 25-year mortality was significantly higher for non-volunteers and exclusions. Differences between observed and predicted six-year total mortality for trial participants were largely attributable to volunteers and exclusions, but there were additional differences for CHD mortality, which were likely due to downward secular trends. These results emphasize the importance of anticipating these factors during clinical trial design, even for trials of short duration.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 1, No. 2, 148-161 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774504cn018oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
C. L Meinert
Long-term drug prevention trials
Clinical Trials, April 1, 2008; 5(2): 168 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. Ishani, G. A. Grandits, R. H. Grimm, K. H. Svendsen, A. J. Collins, R. J. Prineas, J. D. Neaton, and for the MRFIT Research Group
Association of Single Measurements of Dipstick Proteinuria, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, and Hematocrit with 25-Year Incidence of End-Stage Renal Disease in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2006; 17(5): 1444 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement