Clinical Trials

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, I. R
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, I. R
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Trials, Vol. 2, No. 2, 141-151 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn081oa

Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis

Ian R White

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UKian.white{at}mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk

James Thomas

EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London, UK

The magnitude of the effect of an intervention on a quantitative outcome may be expressed as a standardized mean difference by dividing the difference in means by the standard deviation of the outcome. This is useful to compare outcomes measured using different scales, especially in meta-analysis. However, uncertainty about the standard deviation leads to complicated formulae to avoid bias and to compute the correct standard error. We review approximate and exact formulae and argue for the use of the exact formulae. We then extend the formulae to cluster-randomized trials, and show how the calculations may be implemented using published results. We also describe methods for estimating the standard deviation. Various pitfalls are identified which can lead to major errors especially in the cluster-randomized setting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
G. Bravo, M.-F. Dubois, and P.-M. Roy
Using goal attainment scaling to improve the quality of long-term care: a group-randomized trial
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 511 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]