This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Beunckens, C. Articles by Kenward, M. G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beunckens, C. Articles by Kenward, M. G Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials

Center for Statistics, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Diepenbeek, Belgium

Geert Molenberghs

Center for Statistics, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Universitaire Campus, Building D, B–3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; geert.molenberghs{at}luc.ac.be

Michael G Kenward

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Background In many clinical trials, data are collected longitudinally over time. In such studies, missingness, in particular dropout, is an often encountered phenomenon.

Methods We discuss commonly used but often problematic methods such as complete case analysis and last observation carried forward and contrast them with broadly valid and easy to implement direct-likelihood methods. We comment on alternatives such as multiple imputation and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Results We apply these methods in particular to data from a study with continuous outcomes. The outcomes are modelled using a general linear mixed-effects model. The bias with CC and LOCF is established in the case study and the advantages of the direct-likelihood approach shown.

Conclusions We have established formal but easy to understand arguments for a shift towards a direct-likelihood paradigm when analysing incomplete data from longitudinal clinical trials, necessitating neither imputation nor deletion.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 2, No. 5, 379-386 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn119oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. T. Sherrill, D. I. Sommers, A. A. Nierenberg, A. C. Leon, S. Arndt, K. Bandeen-Roche, J. Greenhouse, D. Guthrie, S.-L. Normand, K. A. Phillips, et al. Integrating Statistical and Clinical Research Elements in Intervention-Related Grant Applications: Summary From an NIMH Workshop Acad Psychiatry, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. D Barnard, J. Cohen, D. J. Jenkins, G. Turner-McGrievy, L. Gloede, A. Green, and H. Ferdowsian A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 1588S - 1596S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Mehuys, L. Van Bortel, L. De Bolle, I. Van Tongelen, L. Annemans, J. P. Remon, and G. Brusselle Effectiveness of pharmacist intervention for asthma control improvement Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2008; 31(4): 790 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Byrnes, D.-Y. Li, K. Park, D. Thompson, C. Mocilnikar, P. Mohan, J. P. Molleston, M. Narkewicz, H. Zhou, S. F. Wolf, et al. Modulation of the IL-12/IFN-{gamma} axis by IFN-{alpha} therapy for hepatitis C J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2007; 81(3): 825 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N R Cook Imputation strategies for blood pressure data nonignorably missing due to medication use Clinical Trials, October 1, 2006; 3(5): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]