SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Heitjan, D. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Heitjan, D. F
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Clinical Trials
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Nonignorable censoring in randomized clinical trials

Jiameng Zhang

FXB 549A, Harvard School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA; jzhang{at}sdac.harvard.edu; Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Daniel F Heitjan

Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Background In a clinical trial, survival may be censored by the end of the study, especially for subjects who enter later in the enrollment period. If there is a trend toward better survival over time then longer survivors experience shorter censoring times (heavier censoring). In such a case, the censoring and survival times are correlated, and thus the censoring is nonignorable in the sense that standard survival models that assume independent censoring could yield incorrect inferences. We will demonstrate a graphical method for analyzing sensitivity of estimates of survival model parameters to small departures from nonignorable censoring.

Methods We assume a parametric model of survival together with a scaled beta model for the censoring process that incorporates the dependence of censoring time on survival time. We assess sensitivity using an index of local sensitivity to nonignorability (Troxel et al. [1]). High sensitivity indicates a large impact of nonignorable censoring on the parameter of interest and a need for additional modeling.

Results A simulation study shows that the approach is valid for practical use. We apply our method to a clinical trial evaluating the survival benefit of a surgically implanted left ventricular assist device in subjects with end-stage heart failure. Sensitivity is somewhat larger in estimates of the mean survival in the device arm, where survival is better and the fraction censored is therefore larger. The degree of nonignorability required to substantially affect estimates is larger than seems plausible, however.

Conclusions Our results illustrate how one can apply sensitivity analysis to evaluate the reliability of survival parameter estimates in a clinical trial.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 2, No. 6, 488-496 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn128oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
M. Yoshida, Y. Matsuyama, and Y. Ohashi
Estimation of treatment effect adjusting for dependent censoring using the IPCW method: an application to a large primary prevention study for coronary events (MEGA study)
Clinical Trials, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 318 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement