This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moser, B. K Articles by George, S. L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moser, B. K Articles by George, S. L Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A general formulation for a one-sided group sequential design

Duke University Medical Center, Box 2717, Durham, NC 27710, USA moser004{at}mc.duke.edu

Stephen L George

Duke University Medical Center, Box 2717, Durham, NC 27710, USA

Background A major contribution to the statistical literature on group sequential designs was provided by Pampallona and Tsiatis who developed closed form functions that can be used to iteratively calculate the boundary points of a family of popular group sequential designs [1]. A related area of interest is the use of conditional probability calculations to make interim decisions in stochastic curtailment procedures.

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to develop group sequential designs based on conditional probabilities, to compare our results to the general closed form family of designs developed by Pampallona and Tsiatis, and to relate these to commonly used stochastic curtailment procedures.

Methods The problem and its solution are formulated and derived mathematically. A graphical interpretation of the results provides the reader with an alternative mechanism to understand the results and their significance.

Results One-sided group sequential design boundary points, as closed form functions, are derived from conditional probability statements. These conditional probability statements can be interpreted as the probability, at the final analysis, of reversing the conclusion reached at an interim state. Under mild constraints, these boundary points are identical to the Pampallona and Tsiatis boundary points. At any interim stage when a boundary point is attained or surpassed we suggest a graphical approach to examine the conditional probability of reversing the interim decision at the final stage versus a range of possible parameter values. For stochastic curtailment procedures, we recommend relaxing (increasing) the conditional probability levels to at least 0.50 so that early stopping is at least as likely as for the O'Brien-Fleming procedure.

Limitations The results are limited to one-sided group sequential designs.

Conclusions Conditional probabilities of reversing interim decisions provides a useful concept to develop group sequential designs and to evaluate stochastic curtailment procedures.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 2, No. 6, 519-528 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn120oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Freidlin and E. L. Korn Monitoring for Lack of Benefit: A Critical Component of a Randomized Clinical Trial J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2009; 27(4): 629 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]