Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeMets, D. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeMets, D. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Futility approaches to interim monitoring by data monitoring committees

David L DeMets

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, demets{at}biostat.wisc.edu

Clinical trials involving participants with high risk of serious events or being exposed to a new intervention with potential serious risk are typically monitored during the course of the trial. Often, this monitoring activity is conducted by an independent group of experts, often referred to as a Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). The DMC responsibility includes monitoring for early evidence of a harmful effect or convincing evidence of a benefit. If the data are consistent and overwhelming, the DMC may recommend that a trial be terminated early. Trials may also be terminated early if the initial goal of demonstrating a benefit cannot in all likelihood be attained, or is futile. These are complicated issues and should be sorted out in the protocol and the DMC charter prior to the start of the trial before data begin to accumulate. Several statistical methods have been developed to assist a DMC in determining when a negative or harmful trend is substantial enough to render the trial continuation futile. These will be briefly summarized. However useful these methods might be, they alone are not adequate to make the decision and the DMC must take into account other issues to make a judgment.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 3, No. 6, 522-529 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774506073115


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Freidlin and E. L. Korn
Monitoring for Lack of Benefit: A Critical Component of a Randomized Clinical Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2009; 27(4): 629 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
L. M. Schilling and R. P. Dellavalle
Dealing With Unanticipated Mortality in a Large Randomized Clinical Trial of Topical Tretinoin
Arch Dermatol, January 1, 2009; 145(1): 76 - 76.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement