This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, K S. Articles by Stevens, V. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, K S. Articles by Stevens, V. J Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using web-based screening to enhance efficiency of HMO clinical trial recruitment in women aged forty and older

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97221, USA sabina.smith{at}kpchr.org

Donna Eubanks

Amanda Petrik

Victor J Stevens

Center for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, USA

Background Screening potential participants for clinical trials can be labor-intensive, particularly when using long questionnaires administered by telephone.

Purpose This report describes the development and use of an interactive recruitment website as a supplemental screening strategy for a study using telephone screening interviews.

Methods Female HMO members, aged 40 and older, were recruited for a study testing dietary change interventions. Cohorts of potential participants were identified from electronic membership records every two to four weeks; they were sent a letter describing the study and then contacted by telephone. Those interested in the study were asked to complete a 27-question screening interview focused on dietary habits. After 14 cohorts of women were recruited by this method (n = 4246), a recruitment website was added and an additional 12 cohorts (n = 3000) were contacted. The modified recruitment letter for these later screening cohorts included the website address and a personal password for each woman. The website contained study information, and those who were interested could complete eligibility screening on-line.

Results Proactive participant response (women actively seeking study participation/screening) to the recruitment mailing was 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.6–10.4%) in the cohorts without the website option and 11.5% (CI, 10.4–12.7%) after addition of the website option (P = 0.004). About half of women screened were ineligible for the study, a proportion that did not statistically differ by recruitment method.

Limitations The study population was limited to middle-aged and older female members of a non-profit health plan, so the generalizability of these findings to other populations is unknown. The pre-post design used in this study does not control for possible temporal changes unrelated to the study methods.

Conclusions The addition of the website screening option was associated with a relative 22% increase in recruitment combined with reduced staff time required for screening, thereby increasing screening efficiency. Web-based options for clinical trial recruitment and screening in targeted populations may increase response rates while also reducing staff time.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 4, No. 1, 102-105 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774506075863


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?