SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ji, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nebiyou Bekele, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ji, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nebiyou Bekele, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals

Yuan Ji

Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, yuanji{at}mdanderson.org

Yisheng Li

Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

B. Nebiyou Bekele

Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Background Most phase I clinical trials conducted at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center use the algorithmic 3 + 3 design, despite the availability of more advanced model-based designs such as the continual reassessment method.

Purpose Through simple statistical modeling and computing, we develop a dose-finding design that can be easily understood and implemented by non-statisticians.

Methods We propose a beta/binomial Bayesian model and a probabilistic up-and-down rule that allow all possible dose-assignment actions to be tabulated in a spreadsheet. We have developed an Excel macro (available at http://odin.mdacc. tmc.edu/~yuanj) that generates trial monitoring tables, which contain the dose-assignment actions corresponding to various toxicity outcomes.

Results The new design outperforms the 3 + 3 design and performs comparably to other model-based methods in the literature.

Limitations The proposed method assumes that the observed toxicity is a binary variable and that toxicity increases with dose level.

Conclusion The new dose-finding design enables physicians to readily determine dose assignments for new patients by referencing a trial monitoring table. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 235—244; http://ctj.sagepub.com

Clinical Trials, Vol. 4, No. 3, 235-244 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774507079442


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. Le Tourneau, J. J. Lee, and L. L. Siu
Dose Escalation Methods in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 20, 2009; 101(10): 708 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement