SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fei Ye
Right arrow Articles by Shyr, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fei Ye,
Right arrow Articles by Shyr, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Balanced two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials

Fei Ye

Division of Cancer Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA

Yu Shyr

Division of Cancer Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA

Background Oncology phase II clinical trials are often designed using Simon's two-stage designs (optimal and `minimax') for independent observations. Simon's designs do not include the use of correlated observations, and do not balance the sample sizes of the two stages. In these designs, the sample sizes of the two stages can be highly unequal. In certain circumstances, an alternative design option that balances the sample sizes is desirable.

Purpose To develop a two-stage phase II design that balances the sample sizes of the first and the second stages, while controlling for type I and type II error rates.

Methods We simulated designs based on response rates under various null and alternative hypotheses, type I and type II error constraints, and the degree of correlation in the case of correlated data. For correlated data, Sargent's method is adopted to account for the loss of information due to intra-person correlation.

Results Design characteristics for different parameter settings were generated using balanced design method, separately for independent and correlated data. Results were evaluated and compared to the optimal and minimax design.

Limitations For correlated data, designs were produced only for trials with half of the participants having one observation and the other half having two. Also, the degree of intra-person correlation was fixed at three levels.

Conclusion The balanced design provides an additional choice for two-stage phase II trials when the investigators would like to monitor the trial near a study's halfway point. Meanwhile, its total sample sizes are comparable with Simon's designs. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 514—524. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Clinical Trials, Vol. 4, No. 5, 514-524 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774507084102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement