| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Hormonal regulators of muscle and metabolism in aging (HORMA): design and conduct of a complex, double masked multicenter trialDivision of Biokinesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, fsattler{at}usc.edu
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Background Older persons often lose muscle mass, strength, and physical function. This report describes the challenges of conducting a complex clinical investigation assessing the effects of anabolic hormones on body composition, physical function, and metabolism during aging. Methods HORMA is a multicenter, randomized double masked study of 65—90-year-old community dwelling men with testosterone levels of 150—550 ng/dL and IGF-1 < 167 ng/dL. Subjects were randomized to transdermal testosterone (5 or 10 g/day) and rhGH (0, 3, or 5 µg/kg/day) for 16 weeks. Outcome measures included body composition by DEXA, MRI, and 2H2O dilution; muscle performance (strength, power, and fatigability), VO2peak, measures of physical function, synthesis/breakdown of myofibrillar proteins, other measures of metabolism, and quality of life. Results Major challenges included delay in startup caused by need for 7 institutional contracts, creating a 142-page manual of operations, orientation and training, creating a 121-page CRF; enrollment inefficiencies; scheduling 16 evaluations/ subject; overnight admissions for invasive procedures and isotope infusions; large data and image management and transfer; quality control at multiples sites; staff turnover; and replacement of a clinical testing site. Impediments were largely solved by implementation of a web-based data entry and eligibility verification; electronic scheduling for multiple study visits; availability of research team members to educate and reassure subjects; more frequent site visits to validate all source documents and reliability of data entry; and intensifying quality control in testing and imaging. The study exceeded the target goal of 108 (n = 112) completely evaluable cases. Two interim DSMB meetings confirmed the lack of excessive adverse events, lack of center effects, comparability of subjects, and that distribution of subjects and enrollment will not jeopardize outcomes or generalizability of results. Conclusions Flexibility and rapidly solving evolving problems is critical when conducting highly complex multicenter metabolic studies. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 560—570. http://ctj.sagepub.com
Clinical Trials, Vol. 4, No. 5,
560-571 (2007) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
