Clinical Trials

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hertzberg, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cotsonis, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hertzberg, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cotsonis, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Trials, Vol. 5, No. 1, 23-30 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774507087781
© 2008 The Society for Clinical Trials

Use of dose modification schedules is effective for blinding trials of warfarin: evidence from the WASID study

Vicki Hertzberg

Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, vhertzb{at}sph.emory.edu

Marc Chimowitz

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Michael Lynn

Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Cristen Chester

Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA

William Asbury

Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA

George Cotsonis

Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Background Randomized clinical trials are blinded to prevent knowledge of treatment assignment from influencing outcomes and their assessments, thus protecting the trial's scientific integrity. Trials involving a warfarin treatment arm are difficult to blind due to the need to continuously adjust dose.

Purpose We sought to examine the effectiveness of blinding secondary stroke prevention trials with a warfarin treatment arm in which the blinding system incorporates use of placebo warfarin dose modification schedules for patients in the placebo warfarin arm.

Methods We examined treatment assignment guesses of 569 patients or their next of kin as well as study coordinators and principal neurologists at the clinical sites in a multicenter, randomized, double-dummy, double-blinded clinical trial of warfarin and aspirin using dose adjustment schedules for management of placebo warfarin. Results Overall, the crude rates of correct responses are 60% for patient/proxy, 66% for study coordinator, and 56% for principal neurologist. Several indices were used to assess the consistency of guesses with what would be expected if the guessing were done completely at random, and all measures indicate adequate blinding. Limitations Comparison to other trials using warfarin is difficult due to limited data and differences in assessment of blinding. However, results compared favorably to one existing trial.

Conclusions Placebo warfarin dose adjustment schedules can protect blinding adequately in trials involving warfarin. Clinical Trials 2008; 5: 23—30. http://ctj.sagepub.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?