This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Morin, S. F Articles by Richards, T A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morin, S. F Articles by Richards, T A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Building community partnerships: case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, Steve.Morin{at}ucsf.edu

Simon Morfit

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco

Andre Maiorana

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco

Apinun Aramrattana

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Pedro Goicochea

Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación, Lima

John Michael Mutsambi

University of Zimbabwe, Harare

Jonathan Leserman Robbins

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

T Anne Richards

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco

Background Differences in resources, knowledge, and infrastructure between countries initiating and countries hosting HIV prevention research trials frequently yield ethical dilemmas. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have emerged as one strategy for establishing partnerships between researchers and host communities to promote community consultation in socially sensitive research.

Purpose To understand the evolution of CABs and community partnerships at international research sites conducting HIV prevention trials.

Methods Three research sites of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) were selected to include geographical representation and diverse populations at risk for HIV/AIDS — in Lima, Peru; Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe; and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Data collection included review of secondary data, including academic publications and site-specific progress reports; observations at the research sites; face-to-face interviews with CAB members, research staff, and other key informants; and focus groups with study participants. Rapid assessment techniques were used for data analysis.

Results Two of the three CABs developed new strategies for community representation in response to new studies. All three CABs expanded their original function and became advocates for broader community interests beyond HIV prevention. The participation and input of community representatives, in response to critical incidents that occurred at the sites over the past five years, helped to solidify partnerships between researchers and communities.

Limitations Rapid Assessment is an exploratory methodology designed to provide an understanding of a situation based on the integration of multiple data sources, collected within a short period of time, without a formal examination of transcribed and coded data. Case studies, as a method, are meant to draw out what can be learned from a single case but are not, in the scientific sense, generalizable.

Conclusions In developing countries, CABs can be dynamic entities that enhance the HIV research process, assist in responding to issues involving research ethics, and prepare communities for HIV research. Clinical Trials 2008; 5: 147—156. http://ctj.sagepub.com

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?