This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shuster, J. J Articles by Ilfeld, B. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shuster, J. J Articles by Ilfeld, B. M Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Applying Hodges-Lehmann scale parameter estimates to hospital discharge times

Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, jshuster{at}biostat.ufl.edu, General Clinical Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Douglas W Theriaque

General Clinical Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Brian M Ilfeld

Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Background: Clinical trials aimed at shortening the time-to-discharge need to have rational and easily understood effect size estimates for health care management organizations. A natural choice is a scale model, where the distribution of time to discharge on one treatment is assumed to be the same as times that on the other. If, for example =0.6, then one treatment is associated with a 40% reduction in discharge time. In designing and analyzing these studies, we need to have the capability to accommodate right censored data, as it is plausible that some patients may never meet the discharge criteria, even though they do get discharged.

Purpose: Utilizing the ideas of Hodges and Lehmann, to provide methods for analysis of trials aimed at shortening hospital discharge times, using point and interval estimates of scale parameters based on the Gehan generalization of the Mann—Whitney—Wilcoxon test, which accommodates right censoring for situations where patients never meet discharge criteria (+).

Methods: For every value of > 0, we shall test the null hypothesis that the distribution of discharge times on one treatment is the same times that on the other. The values of that we fail to reject form the confidence interval for the true .

Results: The methods were developed and applied to a real clinical trial for times to meet the three objective discharge criteria in knee replacement surgery for two post-operative pain control strategies (usual care plus a perineural infusion of either placebo or 0.2% ropivocaine, until the morning following surgery). Based on 48 randomized patients, the point estimate (95% confidence limits) for was 0.47 (0.32—0.67), favoring ropivocaine.

Limitations: The methods cannot as yet be applied to group sequential designs or studies with more than two treatments.

Conclusion: This methodology is an effective way to analyze two-arm trials involving continuous hospital discharge time data.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 5, No. 6, 631-634 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774508098327


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?