This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Berry, D. Articles by Newell, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berry, D. Articles by Newell, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Antioxidants Dietary Supplements Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bayesian model averaging in meta-analysis: vitamin E supplementation and mortality

Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, dberry{at}mdanderson.org

J. Kyle Wathen

Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center

Margaret Newell

Division of Internal Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center

Context The strength and relevance of a meta-analysis depends on the validity of the statistical methods used. Of special importance is appropriately assessing different sources of variability. Many studies including meta-analyses have evaluated the efficacy and safety of vitamin E and have yielded varying results. Illuminating and resolving these disparities requires addressing study variability and model uncertainty.

Objective To describe Bayesian meta-analysis methods for combining data from clinical trials, using recent studies that analyzed the relationship between vitamin E dose and all-cause mortality.

Data Sources Studies used in a previously published meta-analysis appended by studies identified by a search of MEDLINE from August 2004 to December 2005 using the MeSH terms vitamin e and alpha tocopherol.

Study Selection Inclusion criteria: men and nonpregnant women; use of vitamin E alone or in combination with other vitamins or minerals; random allocation of participants to either vitamin E or a placebo or other control group; intervention and follow-up duration greater than 1 year; 10 or more deaths.

Data Extraction Independent data extraction by one author was reviewed and confirmed by a second author. Corresponding authors of the original publications were contacted when questions arose.

Data Synthesis Data collection included the number of patients and deaths, percent men, use of other vitamins or minerals, mean age, and length of follow-up. We combined study results using Bayesian hierarchical model averaging. Analyses used Markov chain Monte Carlo computational techniques.

Conclusions Vitamin E intake is unlikely to affect mortality regardless of dose. The Bayesian meta-analyses presented here are ideal for incorporating disparate sources of variability, including trial effect and model uncertainty. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 28—41. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Clinical Trials, Vol. 6, No. 1, 28-41 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774508101279


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Greenland Weaknesses of Bayesian model averaging for meta-analysis in the study of vitamin E and mortality Clinical Trials, February 1, 2009; 6(1): 42 - 46. [PDF]