| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Confronting challenges in intervention research with ethnically diverse older adults: the USC Well Elderly II TrialDivision of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, USA, jmjackso{at}usc.edu
Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, USA
Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, USA
Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, USA
Department of Psychology, California State University Fullerton
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
School of Social Work, University of Southern California
Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California
Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California
Department of Behavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University
School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, USA
Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, USA Background Community-dwelling older adults are at risk for declines in physical health, cognition, and psychosocial well-being. However, their enactment of active and health-promoting lifestyles can reduce such declines. Purpose The purpose of this article is to describe the USC Well Elderly II study, a randomized clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle program for elders, and document how various methodological challenges were addressed during the course of the trial. Methods In the study, 460 ethnically diverse elders recruited from a variety of sites in the urban Los Angeles area were enrolled in a randomized experiment involving a crossover design component. Within either the first or second 6-month phase of their study involvement, each elder received a lifestyle intervention designed to improve a variety of aging outcomes. At 4—5 time points over an 18—24 month interval, the research participants were assessed on measures of healthy activity, coping, social support, perceived control, stress-related biomarkers, perceived physical health, psychosocial well-being, and cognitive functioning to test the effectiveness of the intervention and document the process mechanisms responsible for its effects. Results The study protocol was successfully implemented, including the enrollment of study sites, the recruitment of 460 older adults, administration of the intervention, adherence to the plan for assessment, and establishment of a large computerized data base. Limitations: Methodological challenges were encountered in the areas of site recruitment, participant recruitment, testing, and intervention delivery. Conclusions The completion of clinical trials involving elders from numerous local sites requires careful oversight and anticipation of threats to the study design that stem from: (a) social situations that are particular to specific study sites; and (b) physical, functional, and social challenges pertaining to the elder population. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 90—101. http://ctj.sagepub.com
Clinical Trials, Vol. 6, No. 1,
90-101 (2009) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
