SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freidlin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Korn, E. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freidlin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Korn, E. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Stopping clinical trials early for benefit: impact on estimation

Boris Freidlin

Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, freidlinb{at}ctep.nci.nih.gov

Edward L Korn

Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

Background It has been suggested in the literature that the well-known bias of treatment-effect estimators due to the possibility of early stopping for positive results is a major concern with interim monitoring.

Purpose To discuss approaches one might use to compare the inflation of the treatment-effect estimator when the trial is stopped early for positive results with the inflation that would be seen in a comparable set of positive trials that used fixed sample sizes with no interim monitoring, and to quantify the relative inflation of monitored trials relative to that of the corresponding subset of positive fixed sample-size trials.

Methods Via simulation for some O'Brien—Fleming and Haybittle—Peto monitoring boundaries, the inflation of the treatment-effect estimator when the trial crossed an interim-monitoring boundary for positive results is compared with the preferred approach to estimate the inflation from a comparable set of positive fixed sample-size trials.

Results Although the inflation of the treatment-effect estimator when a trial is stopped early can be considerable, only at very early interim analyses (≤25% of information) is this inflation much larger than the inflation that would be seen for an appropriate subset of similar positive fixed sample-size trials. The treatment-effect inflation from stopping at second or later interim analyses that are not so early is relatively small and similar to that seen in the corresponding subset of fixed sample-size trials. Limitations The results apply to adequately powered trials with well-designed prospectively specified interim-monitoring plans.

Conclusions For trials with a well-designed interim-monitoring plan, stopping at 50% or greater information has a negligible impact on estimation. Except for very early interim analyses (≤25% of the information), concerns about the inflation of the treatment effect should be minor. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 119—125. http:// ctj.sagepub.com

Clinical Trials, Vol. 6, No. 2, 119-125 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774509102310


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
S. N Goodman
Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased view
Clinical Trials, April 1, 2009; 6(2): 133 - 135.
[PDF]



Advertisement