SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Trials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giobbie-Hurder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gelber, R. D
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giobbie-Hurder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gelber, R. D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Design, conduct, and analyses of Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98: A randomized, double-blind, phase-III study comparing letrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with receptor-positive, early breast cancer

Anita Giobbie-Hurder

International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center (IBCSG), Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, agiohur{at}jimmy.harvard.edu

Karen N Price

International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center (IBCSG), Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, MA, USA

Richard D Gelber

International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center (IBCSG), Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, MA, USA, Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Background Aromatase inhibitors provide superior disease control when compared with tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Purpose To present the design, history, and analytic challenges of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial: an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase-III study comparing the aromatase inhibitor letrozole with tamoxifen in this clinical setting.

Methods From 1998—2003, BIG 1-98 enrolled 8028 women to receive monotherapy with either tamoxifen or letrozole for 5 years, or sequential therapy of 2 years of one agent followed by 3 years of the other. Randomization to one of four treatment groups permitted two complementary analyses to be conducted several years apart. The first, reported in 2005, provided a head-to-head comparison of letrozole versus tamoxifen. Statistical power was increased by an enriched design, which included patients who were assigned sequential treatments until the time of the treatment switch. The second, reported in late 2008, used a conditional landmark approach to test the hypothesis that switching endocrine agents at approximately 2 years from randomization for patients who are disease-free is superior to continuing with the original agent. Results The 2005 analysis showed the superiority of letrozole compared with tamoxifen. The patients who were assigned tamoxifen alone were unblinded and offered the opportunity to switch to letrozole. Results from other trials increased the clinical relevance about whether or not to start treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen, and analysis plans were expanded to evaluate sequential versus single-agent strategies from randomization.

Limitations Due to the unblinding of patients assigned tamoxifen alone, analysis of updated data will require ascertainment of the influence of selective crossover from tamoxifen to letrozole.

Conclusions BIG 1-98 is an example of an enriched design, involving complementary analyses addressing different questions several years apart, and subject to evolving analytic plans influenced by new data that emerge over time.

Clinical Trials, Vol. 6, No. 3, 272-287 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1740774509105380


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
The BIG 1-98 Collaborative Group
Letrozole Therapy Alone or in Sequence with Tamoxifen in Women with Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., August 20, 2009; 361(8): 766 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement