Clinical Trials

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Espeland, M. A
Right arrow Articles by Bassford, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Espeland, M. A
Right arrow Articles by Bassford, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Trials, Vol. 3, No. 2, 99-106 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/1740774506cn140oa

Benchmarks for designing two-stage studies using modified mini-mental state examinations: experience from the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study

Mark A Espeland

Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; mespelan{at}wfubmc.edu

Stephen R Rapp

Department of Public Health Sciences; Department of Psychiatry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

Julia Robertson

Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

Iris Granek

Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA

Carol Murphy

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Marilyn Albert

Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Tamsen Bassford

College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Background The most efficient approach for studies examining the incidence of dementia involves a brief screening instrument to identify participants for more extensive testing to identify cognitive impairment. The modified mini-mental state examination (3MS) is commonly used as this initial screen in such two-stage designs, however its properties for this role require further study.

Purpose We use data from the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study to contrast design options in two-stage designs.

Methods This trial enrolled 7251 participants with nine or more years of education who were aged 65–79 and followed an average of four to five years. Logistic regression was used to examine the case yields at varying two-stage 3MS cutpoints. The efficiency of using different examination schedules and restricting enrollment to higher risk women was examined.

Results Probable dementia is associated with marked decline in 3MS scores. The percentages of women classified with probable dementia ranged from 7.95% (3MS 85–88) to 50.0% (3MS = 70). The numbers [95% confidence interval] of enrolled women necessary to detect one case of probable dementia (four-year follow-up) for baseline 3MS scores of 100, 95, 90 and 85 were estimated as 1477 [389, 5618], 253 [134, 481], 53 [34, 85], and 14 [9, 23], respectively. Compared to annual testing, administration every two years increased the number of required enrollees by 11%, but decreased the number of test administrations by 46%.

Limitations Our findings are influenced by the characteristics of our study group, its rates of retention, and the study protocol, and may not fully generalize to other settings.

Conclusions The 3MS can serve as an efficient basis for two-stage study designs and a cutpoint of 88 is reasonable for populations with similar characteristics. Studies may improve efficiency by using the 3MS during screening to eliminate women with low risk for dementia and by conducting testing every two years.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
A. L. Fitzpatrick, C. K. Buchanan, R. L. Nahin, S. T. DeKosky, H. H. Atkinson, M. C. Carlson, J. D. Williamson, and for the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) Study In
Associations of Gait Speed and Other Measures of Physical Function With Cognition in a Healthy Cohort of Elderly Persons
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2007; 62(11): 1244 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]